Skip to content
Draft Sickos
Back to the 2021 class
Retrospective scouting report · Class of 2021Consensus #067
QB· Round 3

Davis
Mills.

Davis Mills
Sickos Grade
63.5/100
Pre-draft #67

Stanford official athletic logoStanford· 6'3"· 217 lb· 4.82s 40

/ Recruiting profile
★★★★★stars.9918
National · #15HS class · 2017
Greater Atlanta Christian School, GA
247Sports composite via CFBD
R3 · #67 · Houston Texans

"A Stanford pocket passer with only 11 college starts (knee injuries erased most of his career) and the cleanest tape-processor grade of the QB6-9 tier."Pre-draft read

01Play style

Operating as a traditional pocket passer, this quarterback prioritizes his substantial arm strength and quick-game rhythm over elite mobility or anticipation. He consistently delivers to underneath and intermediate windows on schedule, showcasing clean drops and precise footwork from a pristine pocket. While deep-ball placement is functional on schemed concepts like four verticals and dagger routes, his off-platform accuracy wanes when compelled to vacate the launch point.

Mobility presents a notable limitation, as his 5.06-second pro-day forty precludes designed movement plays and he often absorbs sacks instead of extending plays. His football IQ is a plus for a backup, with pre-snap identification and protection reads translating smoothly to diverse pro-style schemes.

02Scheme fit
Ideal system

Pro-style dropback passing game built on timing, intermediate accuracy, and quick rhythm, leveraging a clean pocket and a plus arm to attack downfield.

Pocket passerDropback QBPro-style QB
Best role

Year 1 as a QB3 with developmental upside to a long-term reliable backup (QB2) who can win a few spot starts if the situation is clean.

Wrong fit

Any system with a heavy emphasis on designed quarterback runs, bootlegs, or scramble drills where off-platform throws are a primary component of the passing game.

Davis Mills is a traditional pocket passer whose arm talent and football IQ are best utilized in a pro-style scheme that values rhythm and timing over mobility and second-reaction plays.

03Film room

Davis Mills 2020 Highlights | Stanford QB

Full 2020 Stanford senior-sample cut — pro-style under-center drops, intermediate rhythm hits and red-zone throws that framed the pre-draft top-100 grade.

2021 NFL Draft Profile: Stanford QB Davis Mills

Official Pac-12 pre-draft feature walking through the five-star pedigree, David Shaw scheme fit and the developmental-QB projection.

Davis Mills 2021-2022 Rookie Highlights

Texans rookie-season cut from the 11-start emergency-starter role — the exact backup/spot-starter usage the pick projected into.

04The evaluation

This quarterback projects as a traditional pocket passer whose evaluation was heavily weighted by five-star recruiting status and a pro-style pedigree rather than extensive college game experience. His arm talent and clean mechanics provided a foundation for projection, suggesting a player who could develop into a functional pocket operator with a simplified command of an offense.

The prospect logged only 11 career starts at Stanford, with a knee injury limiting his collegiate playing time. His most significant sample came in a compressed six-game 2020 season in a traditional pro-style offense, where he completed 66% of his passes for 1,508 yards, 11 touchdowns, and 3 interceptions. This limited exposure meant evaluators had to extrapolate significantly, based on scheme fit and a physically mature frame.

Concerns about his limited body of work and durability flags were notable, presenting a trade-off between pedigree and proven production. Despite these flags, his potential was recognized, positioning him as a Day 2 prospect, and he was ultimately selected at pick 67.

05Strengths
  1. 01

    Arm talent

    He layers intermediate throws and drives the ball outside numbers, providing functional capability for a backup role.

  2. 02

    Pro-style experience

    His work with under-center drops and seven-step concepts translates directly to NFL schemes.

  3. 03

    Efficient 2020 sample

    He completed 66% of passes with 11 touchdowns against 3 interceptions, showing red-zone anticipation.

  4. 04

    High football IQ

    His pre-snap identification and protection reads project as an asset for immediate backup duties.

  5. 05

    Quick-game timing

    He leads receivers on slants and stick concepts with appropriate anticipation, supporting a rhythm-thrower baseline.

06Concerns
  1. 01

    Thin body of work

    Only 11 career college starts presented a significant bust risk due to reliance on recruiting projection.

  2. 02

    Durability flags

    Medical concerns from a knee injury limited his reps and raised questions for evaluators.

  3. 03

    Limited mobility

    A 5.06 pro-day forty restricts designed movement and prevents him from extending plays effectively.

  4. 04

    Off-platform accuracy woes

    His accuracy dips sharply when pocket pressure forces him to move, impacting ball placement.

07Athletic testing
Height
6'3"
Weight
217 lb
40 yd
4.82s
Vertical
32"
Broad
9'2"
3-cone
6.95s
Shuttle
4.40s
06Athletic profilevs. QB on Big Board
40VERTBRD3CSHTLBNCH

— — — positional median (p50)

40 yd
4.82sp50
Vertical
32inp50
Broad jump
110inp50
Three-cone
6.95sp50
Shuttle
4.40sp50
Bench
rep
08College production
YrTeamGCmpAttYdsTDInt
2018Stanford102000
2019Stanford81572401943115
2020Stanford5127193151073
Career142844353453188

A dash means the figure is not published by a source we trust — never a zero we invented.

/ Usage share, 2020
61.6%of team plays
95 percentile at positionStanford
Pass plays · 98.0%Run plays · 13.7%Third down · 78.3%Passing downs · 79.3%
CFBD usage — share of the offense's plays involving the player
09Pro comparisons
/ Likely outcome
Chase DanielRetired

Realistic: long-tenure well-paid QB2 with occasional spot-start value

/ Ceiling
Kirk CousinsATL

Ceiling: pocket-passer rhythm starter, unlikely without the same accuracy

/ Floor
Brandon WeedenRetired

Floor: veteran QB2 with limited starter runway

10In hindsight

Everything above is the pre-draft evaluation. This section is what actually happened — updated year over year.

Pro Bowls
0
All-Pro
0
Seasons
Career AV
10

Solid bridge / spot-starter career. Thrust into the starter role Week 3 of 2021 after Watson's absence — flashed rookie promise (16 TD, 10 INT in 11 starts). Lost the job to C.J. Stroud after 2022. Now Houston's QB2 through 2024 and 2025 on the veteran-backup contract. Best-case scenario for a Round-3 QB.

Pre-draft context: One-year Stanford starter (11 career starts) whose file was almost entirely projection off a five-star recruiting pedigree — the #1 pro-style QB of his 2017 high school class — plus a compressed 2020 sample where he threw for 1,508 yards, 11 TD / 3 INT with 66% completion in six games in a traditional pro-style offense. Measured 6'4"/217 with a plus arm and clean footwork on the tape that existed, but injury history (knee at Stanford) capped his starter reps and limited the body of work.

Fit with Houston: The organization drafted him at #67 as the developmental heir in the Deshaun Watson standoff, with Watson demanding a trade and not playing in 2021. Rookie year became the emergency starter — 11 starts, 2,664 yds, 16 TD / 10 INT, 66.8% completion. 2022 full-time starter in a defense-first system, 17 starts, 2,997 yds, 17 TD / 15 INT on a 3-13-1 team. 2023 lost the QB1 job to C.J. Stroud (No. 2 overall) and slotted to QB2.

Signed a 2-year, $10M extension in 2024 (avg $5M/yr) as the Stroud backup, then extended again in 2026 for another 2 years, giving him one of the higher-paid QB2 roles in the league. Retrospective: A soft hit relative to slot — never became a starter, but became one of the league's most stable veteran QB2s and the definitional Day-2 backup outcome, which is exactly what teams hope to get from a #67 QB.

Draft Sickos · retrospective scouting profile