Skip to content
Draft Sickos
Back to the 2010 class
Retrospective scouting report · Class of 2010R6 · #202
S· Round 6

Jordan
Pugh.

JP
Sickos Grade
49.7/100

Texas A&M official athletic logoTexas A&M

R6 · #202 · CAR
02Scheme fit
Ideal system

Pugh fits best in a Cover-3 match or Quarters system, where his ability to read and react to routes in zone coverage can be maximized.

Free SafetyDeep half safetySlot defender
Best role

Year 1: backup free safety, core special teams; Ceiling: starting free safety with ability to rotate into the slot.

Wrong fit

His value diminishes significantly in heavy man-to-man schemes due to his limited top-end speed and change-of-direction ability.

Pugh projects as a versatile depth piece in a zone-heavy secondary, contributing immediately on special teams while developing his coverage instincts.

07Athletic testing
Relative Athletic Score
7.05
/10 · official

Relative Athletic Score (Kent Lee Platte) benchmarks combine/pro-day numbers against every measured prospect at the position since 1987. 10.00 is elite; 5.00 is average.

06Athletic profilevs. S on Big Board

No athletic data recorded

08College production
YrTeamGTklSkIntPDFF
2008Texas A&M00100
2009Texas A&M00300
Career00400

A dash means the figure is not published by a source we trust — never a zero we invented.

10In hindsight

Everything above is the pre-draft evaluation. This section is what actually happened — updated year over year.

Pro Bowls
0
All-Pro
0
Seasons
4
Career AV
4
Draft Sickos · retrospective scouting profile